CVE-2026-68494
The fix released in jackson-core 2.18.6 and 2.21.1 for CVE-2026-18401 (GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq, number length constraint bypass in the non-blocking parser) is incomplete. This record covers the remaining bypass. The earlier fix wired validateIntegerLength() into a new _setIntLength() helper and invoked it wherever the integer portion of a number is decided: a terminator byte arrives, a '.' or 'e'/'E' is seen, or input ends inside a fully buffered value. It was not invoked on the attacker-relevant path where the parser runs out of input while still inside the MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS minor state and returns NOT_AVAILABLE to the caller. As a result, an attacker who streams JSON to a non-blocking parser in many small chunks, without ever sending a terminator byte, keeps the parser inside MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS indefinitely. _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment() grows the accumulator on every chunk while validateIntegerLength() is never called. The accumulator is bounded only by maxStringLength (20 MiB by default) rather than by maxNumberLength (1000 by default), an amplification of roughly 20,000x over the documented limit. Because Java char values occupy two bytes, a single connection can be driven to approximately 40 MiB of heap before the validator finally fires when the value completes. The equivalent fraction-path code is correct: _finishFloatFraction() calls _setFractLength() before its NOT_AVAILABLE return. The missing call affects the integer-digit paths in _startPositiveNumber(), _startNegativeNumber() and _finishNumberIntegralPart() in NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase. Impact: reactive frameworks such as Spring WebFlux/Reactor, Quarkus, Helidon and Vert.x feed inbound HTTP or gRPC bytes to the async parser as they arrive, which is precisely the chunked-feed shape required. Operators who set StreamReadConstraints.maxNumberLength expecting it to cap memory per number value do not get that guarantee; memory accumulates per concurrent connection and attacker-contro
What this means for your business
- FIRST's prediction model gives it a 0.6% chance of attack attempts being seen in the next 30 days, ranking above 47% of all known flaws.
What to do
- 1Ask your IT team or provider whether any of your systems use the affected product.
- 2If you do, follow the vendor's guidance. No patch reference has been published yet.
Fastnexa security experts
Not sure if your company is exposed to CVE-2026-68494?
Tell us where you run the affected software and a Fastnexa penetration tester will check whether this flaw, or others like it, can be used against your websites, apps and network.
The full test is free for our first 10 founding clients until 31 December 2026. See the offer
Think you’ve already been hit? Don’t wait on a form: call or WhatsApp +1 (732) 454 2616. We reply within 1 hour, 24/7. Emergency help →
Scoring
- CVSS
- Not yet scored
- CVSS v4
- 8.7
- Weakness
- CWE-770
- Assigned by
- 36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542c
Dates
- Published
- 2026-08-04
- Last modified
- 2026-09-08
- Sources
- NVD
References
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/commit/050b429804dce2a7e08f0be1b0b4c3d040fdb9cd
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/commit/4cdd529749da396cc7edf6d4a2aad41d47902641
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/commit/c5941e5aae7fd5aeac55d66933cfb82b9aabeef8
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/1611
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/security/advisories/GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18401
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/security/advisories/GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9